GRE blog, Strategy for 99th percentile score

Saturday, January 10, 2015

An Ideal way to tackle Critical Reasoning Question:

Outsourcing is the practice of obtaining from an independent supplier a product or service that a company has previously provided for itself. Since a company’s chief objective is to realize the highest possible year-end profits, any product or service that can be obtained from an independent supplier for less than it would cost the company to provide the product or service on its own should be outsourced.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
(A) If a company decides to use independent suppliers for a product, it can generally exploit the vigorous competition arising among several firms that are interested in supplying that product.
(B) Successful outsourcing requires a company to provide its suppliers with information about its products and plans that can fall into the hands of its competitors and give them a business advantage.
(C) Certain tasks, such as processing a company’s payroll, are commonly outsourced, whereas others, such as handling the company’s core business, are not.
(D) For a company to provide a product or service for itself as efficiently as an independent supplier can provide it, the managers involved need to be as expert in the area of that product or service as the people in charge of that product or service at an independent supplier are.
(E) When a company decides to use an independent supplier for a product or service, the independent supplier sometimes hires members of the company’s staff who formerly made the product or provided the service that the independent supplier now supplies.

An Ideal way to tackle critical reasoning Question:
1. First find the question type (time: 5-10 sec)
2. Read the argument critically finding any logical gap, if any. Focus on the conclusion
3. Read the question
4. Pre-think about your answer
5. Eliminate the obvious wrong answers
6. Choose the best answer

Let’s apply the Strategy:
1.     First find the question type (time: 5-10 sec) :

Weakening question: So, we have to attack the conclusion or reasoning behind the conclusion.

2.     Read the argument critically finding any logical gap, if any

First Sentence: Outsourcing is the practice of obtaining from an independent supplier a product or service that a company has previously provided for itself.

My thought: Well, here is the definition of outsourcing given. And my simplified thinking of this sentence is: outsourcing is the practice of obtaining a product from a supplier.

Second Sentence: Since a company’s chief objective is to realize the highest possible year-end profits, any product or service that can be obtained from an independent supplier for less than it would cost the company to provide the product or service on its own should be outsourced.

My thought: Here is the conclusion of the argument that is a company should outsource a service if it costs the company less than it would cost the company to make or provide the service. The reasoning given behind this conclusion is that a company’s main object is to ensure the highest possible profit.

3.     Read the question
The question asked to undermine the argument. So, let’s attack the conclusion.

4. Pre-think about your answer
What if the company does harm itself by outsourcing?

5. Eliminate the obvious wrong answers

(A) If a company decides to use independent suppliers for a product, it can generally exploit the vigorous competition arising among several firms that are interested in supplying that product.

My thought: If there is any competition among the suppliers, then it would lower the price of the service. So, it would actually strengthen the argument than weaken the argument. So, Eliminate A.

(B) Successful outsourcing requires a company to provide its suppliers with information about its products and plans that can fall into the hands of
its competitors and give them a business advantage.


My thought: If outsourcing causes the company some disadvantage by leaking some important information, then it surly calls the conclusion into question. So, let’s keep it for now.

(C) Certain tasks, such as processing a company’s payroll, are commonly outsourced, whereas others, such as handling the company’s core business, are not.


My thought: This does not make any sense to me because this option does not attack or support the argument. Eliminate C.

(D) For a company to provide a product or service for itself as efficiently as an independent supplier can provide it, the managers involved need to be as expert in the area of that product or service as the people in charge of that product or service at an independent supplier are.


My thought: This option says that the manager of the company which seeks product or service should be similarly expert as the manager of the supplier company. But, this information does not weaken the conclusion. Mind it, out main purpose is to prove that the company will not get profit or it will harm itself by outsourcing. So, eliminate D.

(E) When a company decides to use an independent supplier for a product or service, the independent supplier sometimes hires members of the company’s staff who formerly made the product

My thought: If the independent supplier hires member’s from the company that has sought the product, then it does not necessarily weaken the conclusion that a company should outsource because it wants to get the maximum profit feasible. Eliminate E.
So, we have eliminated every choice but B. So, B is the answer because by taking the advantage of the outsourcing, the company is harming itself by leaking important information. And, by using this this information, the competitors are taking advantage of the product. Hence, the company is not necessarily maximizing the profit by outsourcing. Rather, outsourcing is putting the company into jeopardy.